日本郵便株式会社に対する行政指導

We need your help to make a common-sense bill into California law. Despite the fact that California has one of the nation’s most comprehensive data privacy laws, it’s not always easy for people to exercise those privacy rights. A.B. 566 intends to make it easy by directing browsers to give all their users the option to tell companies they don’t want personal information that’s collected about them on the internet to be sold or shared. Now, we just need Governor Gavin Newsom to sign it into law by October 13, 2025, and this toolkit will help us put on the pressure. Tweet at Gov. Gavin Newsom and help us get A.B. 566 signed into law!

First, pick your platform of choice. Reach Gov. Newsom at any of his social media handles:

• X: @CAgovernor
• Bluesky: @governor.ca.gov
• TikTok: @cagovernor
• Facebook: @CAgovernor

Then, pick a message that resonates with you. Or, feel free to remix!

Sample Posts

• It should be easy for Californians to exercise our rights under the California Consumer Privacy Act, but major internet browser companies are making it difficult for us to do that. @CAgovernor, sign AB 566 and give power to the consumers to protect their privacy!
• We are living in a time of mass surveillance and tracking. Californian consumers should be able to easily control their privacy and AB 566 would make that possible. @CAgovernor, sign AB 566 and ensure that millions of Californians can opt out of the sale and sharing of their private information!
• People seeking abortion care, immigrants, and LGBTQ+ people are at risk of bad actors using their online activity against them. @CAgovernor could sign AB 566 and protect the privacy of vulnerable communities and all Californians.
• AB 566 gives Californians a practical way to use their right to opt-out of websites selling or sharing their private info. @CAgovernor can sign it and give consumers power over their privacy choices under the California Consumer Privacy Act.
• Hey @CAgovernor! AB 566 makes it easy for Californians to tell companies what they want to happen with their own private information. Sign it and make the California Consumer Privacy Act more user-friendly!
• Companies haven’t made it easy for Californians to tell companies not to sell or share their personal information. We need AB 566 so that browsers MUST give users the option to easily opt out of this data sharing. @CAgovernor, sign AB 566!
• Major browsers have made it hard for Californians to opt out of the share and sale of their private info. Right now, consumers must individually opt out at every website they visit. AB 566 can change that by requiring browsers to create one single opt-out preference, but @CAgovernor MUST sign it!
• It should be easy for Californians to opt out of the share and sale of their private info, such as health info, immigration status, and political affiliation, but browsers have made it difficult. @CAgovernor can sign AB 566 and give power to consumers to more easily opt out of this data sharing.
• Right now, if a Californian wants to tell companies not to sell or share their info, they must go through the processes set up by each company, ONE BY ONE, to opt out of data sharing. AB 566 can remove that burden. @CAgovernor, sign AB 566 to empower consumers!
• Industry groups who want to keep the scales tipped in favor of corporations who want to profit off the sale of our private info have lobbied heavily against AB 566, a bill that will make it easy for Californians to tell companies what they want to happen with their own info. @CAgovernor—sign it!

　本書の著者は、日本における情報機関、特にＣＩＡ研究の第一人者である。彼が２０００年に 『秘密のファイルＣＩＡの対日工作(上下）』(共 同通信社)を出版した時には驚愕した。　情報機関の活動は秘密に覆われている。それを一部であれ世に知らせた功績は大きい。後に私が彼と話す機会があったとき、「あんな本を出して 命の危険を感じたことはないのか」と問うたところ、彼は笑って「それは ない」と答えた。思わず「命の危険はなかったのか」と、突っこんで 聞きたくなる類の本である。　彼はワシントン..

　不正輸出（外為法違反）の疑いで横浜市内の化学機械メーカー・大川原化工機の社長ほか幹部３人が逮捕・起訴されながら取り消しとなり、その後幹部らが提訴した国家賠償訴訟を経て警察・検察による「違法捜査」が裁かれた件（※）で、前 […]

三菱電機株式会社が提供するMELSEC-QシリーズCPUユニットには、ユーザ認証機能が有効になっている場合に、サービス運用妨害（DoS）の脆弱性が存在します。

Hitachi Energyが提供するRTU500シリーズおよびTRMTrackerには、複数の脆弱性が存在します。

AutomationDirectが提供するCLICK PLUSには、複数の脆弱性が存在します。

Schneider Electricが提供するSESUには、ファイルにアクセスする時のリンク解釈が不適切な脆弱性が存在します。

Viessmannが提供するVitogate 300には、複数の脆弱性が存在します。

フィッシング対策協議会の証明書普及促進ワーキンググループが「送信ドメイン認証技術導入実施状況について -ISP、CATV、モバイル事業者、フリーメール事業者における導入・設定状況-」を公開しました。本報告書では、一般財団法人日本データ通信協会の迷惑メール相談センターが実施した「送信ドメイン認証実施状況」の2023年ならびに2024年の調査結果をもとに、SPF／DKIM／DMARC／BIMIの導入率を集計した結果が示されています。

Thirty years after the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, this GenderIT edition reflects on its legacy and asks how feminist movements can shape the future of gender equality in today’s…

California’s Governor should sign S.B. 7, a common-sense bill to end some of the harshest consequences of automated abuse at work. EFF is proud to join dozens of labor, digital rights, and other advocates in support of the “No Robo Bosses Act.”

Algorithmic decision-making is a growing threat to workers. Bosses are using AI to assess the body language and voice tone of job candidates. They’re using algorithms to predict when employees are organizing a union or planning to quit. They’re automating choices about who gets fired. And these employment algorithms often discriminate based on gender, race, and other protected statuses. Fortunately, many advocates are resisting.

What the Bill Does

S.B. 7 is a strong step in the right direction. It addresses “automated decision systems” (ADS) across the full landscape of employment. It applies to bosses in the private and government sectors, and it protects workers who are employees and contractors. It addresses all manner of employment decisions that involve automated decisionmaking, including hiring, wages, hours, duties, promotion, discipline, and termination. It covers bosses using ADS to assist or replace a person making a decision about another person.

Algorithmic decision-making is a growing threat to workers.

The bill requires employers to be transparent when they rely on ADS. Before using it to make a decision about a job applicant or current worker, a boss must notify them about the use of ADS. The notice must be in a stand-alone, plain language communication. The notice to a current worker must disclose the types of decisions subject to ADS, and a boss cannot use an ADS for an undisclosed purpose. Further, the notice to a current worker must disclose information about how the ADS works, including what information goes in and how it arrives at its decision (such as whether some factors are weighed more heavily than others).

The bill provides some due process to current workers who face discipline or termination based on the ADS. A boss cannot fire or punish a worker based solely on ADS. Before a boss does so based primarily on ADS, they must ensure a person reviews both the ADS output and other relevant information. A boss must also notify the affected worker of such use of ADS. A boss cannot use customer ratings as the only or primary input for such decisions. And every worker can obtain a copy of the most recent year of their own data that their boss might use as ADS input to punish or fire them.

Other provisions of the bill will further protect workers. A boss must maintain an updated list of all ADS it currently uses. A boss cannot use ADS to violate the law, to infer whether a worker is a member of a protected class, or to target a worker for exercising their labor and other rights. Further, a boss cannot retaliate against a worker who exercises their rights under this new law. Local laws are not preempted, so our cities and counties are free to enact additional protections.

Next Steps

The “No Robo Bosses Act” is a great start. And much more is needed, because many kinds of powerful institutions are using automated decision-making against us. Landlords use it to decide who gets a home. Insurance companies use it to decide who gets health care. ICE uses it to decide who must submit to location tracking by electronic monitoring.

EFF has long been fighting such practices. We believe technology should improve everyone’s lives, not subject them to abuse and discrimination. We hope you will join us.

国立研究開発法人審議会　宇宙航空研究開発機構部会（第32回）

令和6年度補正予算「データセンター等の地方分散によるデジタルインフラ強靭化事業」に係る基金設置法人による間接補助事業者の採択